June 5th, 2020

Next
A full text version of this article is available.
To access article obtain online access here or login
 
Title:
Optimal Timing to Warm Day 5 Vitrified Blastocysts for Frozen Embryo Transfer
Authors:  Jennifer Y. Hsu, M.D., Irene Dimitriadis, M.D., Georgios Christou, M.D., Kristy Dickinson, B.S., Christine Veiga, B.S., and Charles L. Bormann, Ph.D.
  OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET) when day 5 (D5) vitrified blastocysts are warmed on the day prior versus the day of transfer.

STUDY DESIGN: In July 2016 our laboratory implemented a protocol change wherein D5 vitrified blastocysts were warmed on the morning of transfer rather than the day prior to transfer. In this retrospective cohort study, transfer cycles before and after the protocol change were compared. The primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Secondary outcome measures included positive pregnancy test (PPT), implantation rate (IMPR), live birth rate (LBR), and spontaneous abortion rate (SABR).

RESULTS: In total, 147 FET cycles were analyzed. When all blastocyst transfers before and after the protocol change were compared, the CPR did not differ, nor did PPT, IMPR, LBR, and SABR. The adjusted odds ratio for CPR of D5 blastocyst transfers was 1.30 (95% confidence interval 0.67–3.53, p value 0.30) when comparing embryos warmed the day of to those the day prior to transfer.

CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pregnancy outcomes are unaffected by day of warming vitrified blastocysts for transfer. Thus, there can be flexibility with the timing of blastocyst warming in the embryology laboratory.
Keywords:  assisted reproductive techniques, blastocyst transfer, cryopreservation, embryo research, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization, live-birth pregnancy rate, pregnancy outcome, vitrification
   
   
  Acrobat Reader 7.0 is recommended to properly view and print the article.
Reader can be downloaded from